Debate: Should graphic pro-life sites be banned? - mirror.co.uk
This is something I am unsure about but I don't think I agree with the reasoning of the first lady in this article. Perhaps if they showed the pictures to women considering abortions the abortion rate would be much lower?
|
|
I am a Christian, wife, mother and homemaker aiming to live up to the standards set out in Proverbs 31 and Titus 2. I breastfeed, use cloth nappies and practise elimination communication. I like to cook from scratch and am learning to cook "Nourishing Traditions" style. I aim to be a good steward both in terms of the resources God has given my family (frugality) and in terms of the resources God has given to everyone ("green" living). Above all I aim to glorify God and obey his will. My blog is about these things.
Visit my Recipe Blog.
© Blogger template ProBlogger Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008
Back to TOP
2 comments:
It's a tricky one. I certainly don't think these photos should be forced on everyone; how upsetting for women who have had miscarriages or who are pregnant. Certainly if a woman considering abortion wants to know all the facts they should be given the truth. I don't think women alone should be help culpable though, what about the men who made them pregnant? In the article by the woman who was against showing photos there was no mention of the remorse felt by the husband who had left her pregnant.
By all means: NO they shouldn't be banned! Sorry to sound harsh, but the woman in the article to me just sounds like a spineless whiner.
It's the same with alllllll of those people who eat meat, but are disgusted when someone (say, a certain Jamie Oliver) depicts the slaughter of a lamb on national t.v. - pure hypocrisy.
Sociiety has made it o.k. for these baby-killing women to play the role of the victim for their entire lives. It's always about them. Their poor little nerves can't handle these true pictures, they will be eaten by guilt for something they have done, and now it's our fault, since WE are the ones telling them about it. Uhmm.. isn't that just crooked?
I absolutely can't stand this type of whining.. I mean, if you're going to be cruel enough to kill your own child, then you should be man (woman?) enough to stand up for it as well. Because (voluntarily!!!) looking at these pictures might make them ill, but is that anything compared to how their child has ended up?
Really.. again, I don't want to sound like a malboro baptist, but they should just bear the consequences of their acts.. and not be protected from the truth, because it 'might hurt them mentally'. The child might have hurt them mentally, and they 'took care of it'.. do we have to keep everything away from them?
greetings from holland! ;)
Post a Comment
"For there is not a word in my tongue, but, lo, O LORD, thou knowest it altogether." ~ Psalm 139:4
Comments are now moderated due to spammers. If you wish to make a private comment or you would like to leave a comment but are unable to do so, please feel free to use my contact form near the top right of my blog.